Society

Thursday

Peter Hoskin

Brown’s take on Harman

The rest of Labour seems sure that Harriet Harman is on manoeuvres, but Gordon Brown was adamant yesterday that there’s no truth to the Westminster gossip. He’s lying, I thought; it’s not as though he’d admit his deputy is undermining his position. But then this in today’s Telegraph: According to one key adviser, [Brown] does not believe reports that [Harman] is jockeying for position – not because he believes she is devoted to his cause, but because “he just thinks it’s preposterous anyone could even consider Harriet could lead anything”. Whether it’s true or not, the Harman story now has an irresistible momentum.  Quotes like that above, while designed to

Wednesday

Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

The Spectator Inquiry–Part Two

We’ve had a great response to our call for help in The Spectator’s wiki-inquiry into the causes of the recession. Our hope is to draw on the collective wisdom of our readers – and we’ve received plenty of it already. So here is the second draft of our inquiry. Please bend it, shape it, any way you want it. Suggestions very much still welcome – on what we can add and, just as importantly, remove: we don’t want to overcomplicate this. If you made a suggestion earlier that is not incorporated and you think it should have been, please leave a comment saying so. If you want a question inserted

James Forsyth James Forsyth

Scrapaccino

Peter Mandelson’s outburst about the chairman of Starbucks is set to go down in political folklore as the bookend to the mushy peas guacamole tale. (Before I’m corrected, I know it wasn’t actually Mandelson who said it, but that is the legend and, as they say, print the legend). The spiritual leader of New Labour attacking the head of the company that brought lattes and cappuccinos to middle Britain feels like the end of an era. But to be serious, it is interesting that Mandelson got so riled by what the foam man said. I suspect that Jane Merrick is right in her analysis: “the strength of his words in the

Alex Massie Alex Massie

The Politico Future

At the New Republic, Gabe Sherman has a fun piece about the rise and rise of Politico, DC’s in-house paper for political intrigue and gossip. There’s plenty to consider: Politico is essentially a web-paper that carries ads in a small circulation print edition circulated on Capitol Hill and K Street. At the moment – though they say this is changing fast – it’s the print edition that makes the profits. Nonetheless, as a niche, but obsessed, audience there’s no doubting the impact Politico has made. The most entertaining bit of the piece is the sniffiness with which “old media” regard this whipper-snapper: Politico’s pace and self-promotion has irritated some in

James Forsyth James Forsyth

The Obama administration must pursue a unified Iran policy 

The greatest foreign policy challenge the Obama administration faces is Iran. The problem posed by Iran is compounded by the sheer number of ways in which Iran is a problem for the US. First and foremost, there is Iran’s nuclear programme. But then there is also Iran’s support for Shiite extremists in Iraq, its role as the major backer of the rejectionists of Hamas and Hezbollah and its desire to make life even more difficult for the US in Afghanistan. This makes policy coordination essential, it is no use the US pursuing one policy in one area only to undercut it elsewhere. But Michael Crowley’s excellent piece on Hillary Clinton’s

Martin Bright

Can the Artists Transform Our High Streets?

It can’t have escaped people’s notice that shops in our high streets are being boarded up at quite an alarming rate. I’ve noticed it in central London, but also in north Wales last week and in Sussex and Surrey this week. Lewes was looking particularly down-at-heel as I passed through: like it was bracing itself for something even more awful. I felt mixed emotions at the Guardian’s piece on the re-use of shops by artists. For all sorts of reasons, I am cheered by the fact that creative people are thinking their way out of the recession. But at the same time this really does confirm just how bad things have become.

James Forsyth James Forsyth

America rules the skies

Mark Bowden’s piece in The Atlantic on American air superiority and the danger of it waning is well worth reading. It is quite remarkable that no American solider has been killed by an enemy air attack since 1953. But the statistic that really grabbed my attention was this one: “The F‑15, the backbone of America’s air power for more than a quarter century, may just be the most successful weapon in history. It is certainly the most successful fighter jet. In combat, its kill ratio over more than 30 years is 107 to zero. Zero. In three decades of flying, no F‑15 has ever been shot down by an enemy plane—and

Daniel Korski

Obama’s “mini surge”

President Obama’s decision to deploy 12,000 more combat forces and 5,000 support personnel to the Afghan mission has drawn huge attention. USA Today’s front-page headline blares “Obama’s war: Deploying 17,000, the president raises the stakes in Afghanistan.” But the US soldiers were already planned to rotate into the theatre and, though the White House is keen to portray this as a Commander in Chief moment and the President making good on his campaign promises, it does not represent a new US Afghan policy. That policy is still being drawn up by Bruce Riedel, the former CIA analyst and Iran expert. In the end, more troops will be needed. But they

James Forsyth James Forsyth

Watford can’t live up to these expectations

One of the key parts of political spin is expectations’ management. But Labour seems to have completely forgotten this when it comes to the G20 summit. The way Labour is talking it up, it if it doesn’t end with Obama chairing Gordon Brown on his shoulders through the streets London while proclaiming that Brown has saved the world it will be a bit of an anti-climax. In reality, the summit probably will give Brown a bit of a boost. It will allow him to play the statesman on the world stage and associating with Obama can’t hurt. (Although the idea of a joint Brown-Obama Wembley rally, which reportedly made it

Peter Hoskin

Brown’s press conference: live blog | 18 February 2009

Stay tuned for live coverage of Brown’s press conference from 1200 onwards.  You can watch proceedings here. 1209: Brown’s taking his time.  Still no sign… 1213: Here’s Brown now, striding to the lecturn. Expect much ado about bonuses. 1213: He’s just come from meeting the heads of the IMF and World Bank.  Leads off saying that the government’s priority is “looking after hard working families”. 1214: Roll call of world leaders he’s meeting: “I thinking we’re fashioning a global solution”. 1215: This may not be PMQs, but it sounds quite similar so far.  Plenty of talk about the government’s “real action”.  No bashing of the “do nothing” Tories, though… 1215:

Lisa Hilton

Italy’s apathetic attitude towards corruption

Another day, another Berlusconi outrage. Writing on the “embarrassment” Silvio Berlusconi must have felt at having received the news of David Mills’s conviction for bribery whilst in conference with Nancy Pelosi, the British press have rather touchingly missed the point. The news is not that Mills has been found guilty, nor that due to Italy’s statute of limitations law he will be unlikely to serve a single day of his sentence, nor that Berlusconi’s government have exempted their leader from trial, nor yet that the “Alfano lodo” is likely to be further manipulated to prevent the judicial conclusion in the Mills case from being permitted as evidence in any future

Peter Hoskin

Redrawing Labour’s rhetoric

On the day the FT reveals that Mandelson is to “redraw [Labour’s] recession rhetoric”, the Times have this breaking story: Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has attacked the chairman and chief executive of Starbucks, the American coffee giant, in a foul-mouthed tirade for talking down the British economy. Howard Schultz, who built the coffee chain which is now struggling in America, said in a television interview last night: “The concern for us is Western Europe and specifically the UK. The UK is in a spiral.” Lord Mandelson later said, within earshot of journalists: “Why should I have that guy running down the country? Who the **** is he?”

Peter Hoskin

Brown: still nothing to do with me, guv

Ok, so I’m not directly quoting Brown in the headline above, but it does capture the general tone of the PM’s article on bonuses in the Times today. Basically, bankers are portrayed as evil, and all government action as wise and benevolent. Here’s a chunk of it: “Everywhere I go in Britain, I sense and share the anger and dismay of millions of hard-working people who have watched in disbelief during a year in which irresponsible practices in global banks have brought the world’s financial system close to collapse. Because this has had an impact on every high street and in every home in Britain, anger alone is not enough –

Peter Hoskin

“Positioning over action”

CoffeeHousers sometimes chide us for getting a bit over-excited when we describe articles as “a must read”, “essential” or “important”.  But the opinion piece by Philip Collins, Tony Blair’s former speechwriter, in today’s Times, really is all of those things.  Collins’ central point – that the Brown administration has elevated “political positioning over action” – is not a new one, but he expands from there to summarise the entire span of the New Labour years, and throws in plenty of healthy references to Sigmund Freud too.  Here’s a key passage: “When Mr Brown commends [Anthony] Crosland’s idea of equality, he does so on the grounds that it provides the Labour

Ross Clark Ross Clark

Want a big bonus? Get yourself a public sector job

Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling rail against bankers’ bonuses. But, says Ross Clark, the really appetising salaries, perks, expense packages and pensions are to be found in the public sector. A terrible reckoning lies ahead for the last fat cats Imagine for a moment that you are a banker in one of the bailed-out banks. You have seen a few of your colleagues disappear into the lift with a bin bag and every time you wander past a pub you have had to endure the thought that there may be drinkers inside demanding you be sentenced to cruel and more unusual punishments. Yet, for all the angst of the past

Tuesday

Peter Hoskin

We must stand up for free markets

As today’s the first anniversary of the Northern Rock nationalisation, I thought I’d re-read Matthew Parris’s stunning defence of free markets in this week’s magazine.  I recommend CoffeeHousers read the whole thing, if they haven’t already, but here’s a key passage: “So amid all the doom-mongering and recanting, I have an assertion to make. The market has not failed. The present collapse is evidence that the market is working. Confidence bubbles are an inherent feature of a free market system. Panics — confidence vacuums — are an inherent feature too. The test of the theory of market capitalism is whether the system provides from within itself the means to prick

Martin Bright

Mills sent down – Lampl turns up

Two stories with no connection really, apart from their capacity to raise an eyebrow. I wondered if David Mills, the estranged husband of Olympics minister Tessa Jowell would ever be convicted but that day has finally come. I remember having lunch with Jowell just after she split from Mills (at the Savoy Grill, naturally) and it was obvious to me that she still had feelings for the controversial lawyer. She explained to me that he was a great man, much misunderstood. I would understand if I got to know him, she said. There were tears in her eyes. I once accused Jowell of helping Italianise British politics, but I wouldn’t

Peter Hoskin

Darling sets a limit

So, Alistair Darling’s announced that the Government is setting a limit on the bonuses that RBS pays out to its staff.  Here’s a section from the Beeb report: Mr Darling said bonuses at RBS would be cut from the £2.5bn paid last year to £340m. There will be “no reward for people who have failed,” he added. And bonuses will no longer be paid in cash, but in shares. The bank will pay “the minimum it can with regard to its legal obligations,” the chancellor said, referring to the fact that some employees are contractually obliged to receive bonuses. The idea of a bonus limit is sound enough to my mind,