Society

Mary Wakefield

After Baby P: the crisis in child foster care

Mary Wakefield talks to a courageous woman who blew the whistle on the deep systemic failures in the foster care service — and whose only reward was to be hounded and vilified I spotted Sarah immediately, though I’d never seen her before and she was tucked in among the commuter crowds ebbing and flowing through Marylebone station. She walked differently from the rest, less preoccupied, more determined, and she carried, as she had said she would, a big black folder under her arm. Sarah had told me about the contents of the folder already, so I knew what it contained: a detailed account of an injustice done to Sarah and

Dirty diggers

The Buddha & Dr Fuhrer, by Charles Allen Charles Allen’s latest book on India has a suitably exotic, occasionally improb- able, cast of characters. Centre stage is Dr Anton Führer, an unscrupulous German archaeologist hell-bent on discovering the legendary — and legendarily elusive — city of Kapilavastu, where the Buddha grew into manhood as Prince Siddhartha. Then there is the thoroughly decent British landowner, William Claxton Peppé, who in 1898 made an astonishing find: a reliquary casket, surrounded by a dazzling collection of jewels and gold, purporting to contain the ashes of the Buddha. A continent away in Europe is the most eminent Sanskrit scholar of his day, Doktor Johann

What I learned from the Somali pirates

Aidan Hartley says that Somali piracy is very well-organised and efficient and is opposed publicly only by militant Muslims — who may yet seize power in Mogadishu The ceaseless piracy off Somalia’s shores — another, Singaporean tanker was hijacked last week — is giving rise to a modern, real-life version of the novel Scoop. Evelyn Waugh’s book is set in Africa’s troubled state of Ishmaelia, where one foreign correspondent breaks a big story from a place called Laku. As soon as it is published, Fleet Street editors begin clamouring for copy from Laku, so the press corps rush into the jungle where they become utterly lost. No wonder. It turns

James Forsyth

The cheek of it

In the weeks since the Labour conference in Manchester, it has been clear that James Purnell has overtaken David Miliband as the leading contender among the Primrose Hill Set. Even though he is considerably more Blairite than Miliband, Purnell is attracting a wider range of support across the party because of his ability to put the Blairite agenda into left-wing language. Indeed, I suspect that if Labour do lose the next election, the ensuing leadership contest will come down to Purnell and Jon Cruddas. Purnell is now confident enough to indulge in a bit of tweaking of Gordon’s tale. As John Rentoul points out, Purnell wonderfully begins the final paragraph

Top Tory calls for a cut in living standards

Labour have been making hay out of the tin-eared comments of various Tories on the recession. First, there was John Maples saying that the recession should be left to take its course. Then, there was Andrew Lansley speculating about the possible health benefits of a recession. But today John Redwood has topped them both with this post on his blog: ‘The truth is that both the UK and the US have to cut living standards… People and governments have spent too much and borrowed to do so.   Now the world’s markets are saying enough is enough. Living standards in both the public and private sector have to be brought

In a spirit of cooperation

One of the more striking aspects of the Damian Green affair is how it’s angered MPs from every side, corner and alcove of the House.  And quite right too – this is something that could have hefty implications for Parliament as a whole.  The Tories and Lib Dems, in particular, have been singing from an almost identical hymn-sheet when condemning the heavy-handedness of the arrest, and now it’s emerged that they’ve taken the cooperation a stage further.  According to the Beeb, Cameron and Clegg are going to meet to “discuss tactics” ahead of the Queen’s Speech tomorrow.  Their aim is to secure a debate on the Green arrest; although one

Jumping off a cliff?

The Standard’s Paul Waugh got there first, but it’s still worth highlighting the comments of Peer Steinbrück, Germany’s finance minister, in an interview with Der Spiegel.  He echoes Angela Merkel’s scepticism of Brown-style, debt-funded fiscal stimuli, but does so with a bit a rhetorical pizazz.  A case in point: “Just because all the lemmings have chosen the same path, it doesn’t automatically make that path the right one.” For more, head over to Paul’s blog.

James Forsyth

The other responsibility to protect

The Pakistan problem is one of the thorniest in international politics. It is almost impossible to see how you deal with a nuclear armed failing state whose government claims, with some justification, that it can’t control its military, intelligence service and all of its territory. But as Bob Kagan writes in the Washington Post today: “…nations should not be able to claim sovereign rights when they cannot control territory from which terrorist attacks are launched. If there is such a thing as a ‘responsibility to protect,’ which justifies international intervention to prevent humanitarian catastrophe either caused or allowed by a nation’s government, there must also be a responsibility to protect

Investigating the investigators

The decision by the Met to hold a review into the Damian Green arrest can only be welcomed – and is perhaps the clearest indication yet that the police feel something’s gone wrong somewhere down the line.  But what will come out of it?  One imagines that the conclusions will necessarily – and perhaps rightly – be limited to matters of police procedure.  Chances are it won’t answer some of the more pertinent questions swirling around the Westminster washbowl: such as which government figures knew what, and when; whether parliamentary figures have failed in their duties; and how Parliament can recover from any damage incurred by this matter.  As James

James Forsyth

A statistic that shames Britain

Camila Batmanghelidjh’s op-ed in The Times today contains a truly shocking fact: The truth, based on research by Kids Company and London University, is that one in five children in deprived inner cities is surviving neglect and abuse.  

As transparent as possible?

An important article by Rachel Sylvester today, on the implications of the Damian Green arrest.  She sees it as a sympton of wider dissatisfaction with the way government information is disseminated: “The Freedom of Information Act, designed to open up the workings of the political elite to the masses, has, they believe, turned into a huge distraction. Last week, the Cabinet Secretary made clear his irritation when he gave evidence to a tribunal considering whether the minutes of Cabinet meetings in the run-up to the war in Iraq should be released. Other senior civil servants moan about the time they spend on freedom of information requests. ‘The whole thing has

Alex Massie

Message from Ottawa

Andrew Coyne defends Stephen Harper from his critics. Or at least, from some of them: While this laissez-faire, do-nothing government contents itself with spending more than any government in the history of Canada — 25% more, after inflation and population growth, than at the start of the decade — and pumping tens of billions of dollars into the banking system, what Canadians demand is “stimulus.” And stimulus, we all know, in a sophisticated, 21st century economy, can be delivered in only one way: by hiring large numbers of unionized men to dig holes in the ground (see “infrastructure.”) Loosening monetary policy doesn’t count. Tax cuts don’t count. It only counts

James Forsyth

Ken Livingstone: I favour 75 percent tax

Ken Livingstone tonight made two quite remarkable statements tonight at the latest Soundings / Comment is Free debate on ‘Who owns the Progressive future?’ The first was boneheaded, the second demonstrated a quite remarkable disdain for democracy and human freedom. John Harris, who was chairing the event, pressed Livingstone on whether he welcomed the introduction of the 45p rate in the PBR and whether he saw this as an important shift—albeit more symbolic than anything else—to the left. Livingstone replied: ‘I’d rather have 45 percent than 40 percent but I’d rather have 75 percent.’ A few moments later, Livingstone mused that ‘real change is going to come out of China’ So

Fraser Nelson

Profiting from profit-making

School reform is by some margin the best Conservative policy, but could it be better still? The Independent today runs a piece in which Michael Gove is told he’s making a “terrific mistake” by refusing to allow his proposed independent schools to make a profit. The comments come from Mikael Sandstrom, a state secretary (or spad, as we call them) but one of the world’s leading authorities on school reform. He is more than just an adviser and has written academic papers showing how much better the “free schools” (as they are called in Sweden) perform. Sweden has reams of data, thousands of students: it isn’t theoretical over there. It

James Forsyth

The new crew

Elections have consequences as John McCain likes to say. So it would be unrealistic of us hawks to expect the president-elect to appoint the kind of national security team that John McCain would have. But from a hawkish perspective, the team unveiled in Chicago this morning is about as good as it gets. Hillary Clinton is one of the soundest Democrats on foreign policy; we can be confident that she will be an advocate for a robust line on Iran. Robert Gates was not an initial supporter of the surge but as defence secretary he has shown an appreciation for what it has achieved. His retention suggests that Obama is

The mole speaks

Nothing surprising in Christopher Galley’s statement just now, but it does support the general idea that Damian Green hasn’t acted in a particularly improper way, and that the police response was disproportionate to the supposed offence.  Here are the key quotes: “If ever there was a case of don’t shoot the messenger, this is surely it… …Most would describe it as embarrassment material and material that is part of the public interest. It’s really not national security, terrorism, financial jeopardy, loss-gain to others.  Nothing remotely like that.”As I see it, the key questions that need answering are still about who in Parliament knew what, and when.