Religion

Beyond The Lunatic Fringe

So, yes, there’s been a mini-hiatus around these parts. Cricket and an unexpected trip to Edinburgh for a first meeting with my godson were largely to blame. Plus, you know, idleness. Anyway, we return to consider this remarkable passage: The Salmond/Saeed axis is not merely a disturbing sign of Salmond’s own prejudices.  It has a potential strategic significance that goes beyond Scotland. The Brotherhood’s strategy for Britain is to promote separate Islamic development, declare sharia-only enclaves and infiltrate mainstream institutions as a springboard for Islamising the entire society. Since Salmond’s aim is to make Scotland independent from the rest of the United Kingdom, with one leap the Brothers could achieve

Score one for common sense instead…

So I see this at The Corner: British Future “Muslims ‘to outnumber traditional churchgoers.’” Score one for Steyn. Interesting (well, sort of) if true! But it turns out that the Telegraph story reports that: The increasing influence of Islam on British culture is disclosed in research today that shows the number of Muslims worshipping at mosques in England and Wales will outstrip the numbers of Roman Catholics going to church in little more than a decade. Projections to be published next month estimate that, if trends continue, the number of Catholic worshippers at Sunday Mass will fall to 679,000 by 2020. By that time, statisticians predict, the number of Muslims

A Picture of Putin

Rod has an excellent and rather moving wee tale about how Time magazine ended up with a photograph of Vladimir Putin not an icon to illustrate its decision to hail Putin as its Person of the Year. It’s a reminder that non-believers can find much to admire in believers. Or, to put it another way, religious devotion that is sincere and modest and personal – and thus the exact opposite of how religion has come to be used in the American political arena – is a tough road to follow but one who’s virtues ought to be apparent even to those of us who remain unpersuaded by organised religion. I

Hitchens on Huckabee

Hitch gets in touch with his inner Mencken today: However, what Article VI does not do, and was never intended to do, is deny me the right to say, as loudly as I may choose, that I will on no account vote for a smirking hick like Mike Huckabee, who is an unusually stupid primate but who does not have the elementary intelligence to recognize the fact that this is what he is. My right to say and believe that is already guaranteed to me by the First Amendment. And the right of Huckabee to win the election and fill the White House with morons like himself is unaffected by

Religious politicians: kooks or not?

Rod Dreher asks: I agree that it was stupid that Romney should have had to have given that speech, but American political culture really left him little choice. As silly as that may seem — as silly as it is — is Britain really better off? This, from Jeff Jacoby’s column on Romney today: It was on Sunday that the Romney campaign announced the forthcoming speech, saying the candidate would discuss how his “own faith would inform his presidency if he were elected.” On the same day in Britain, as it happened, the BBC broadcast an interview with former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who said that his Christian faith had

Romney’s Unsurprisingly Terrible Speech

Mitt Romney’s “Mormon” speech must have been awful; Chris Matthews loved it. Clearly, I’m not the target audience for this sort of thing so it’s perhaps unsurprising that I found it entirely unpersuasive and, in places, quite appalling. Some immediate thoughts… It was nice of Governor Romney to concede that jihadist terrorists are “worse” than Europeans who don’t share the American brand of religion, but really it’s insulting for him to even make the comparison. I didn’t know we were also the enemy. Even if the terrorists are “infinitely worse” it’s significant that the two be bracketed together as examples of the twin perils facing America. Others are better placed

Alex Massie

What an embarrassment!

Mitt’s Mightiest Fan, K-Lo, on the speech: I think a non-talking-head American watching the speech might be embarrassed at the thought that any American might be asked to prove he’s qualified to be president despite his religion. Really? What if the candidate were a Scientologist? Or a Jehovah’s Witness? Or, shudder, a Muslim? I think most Americans would demand to know more about that candidate’s religious views in those circumstances. I think Kathryn would too. Equally, it seems entirely proper that Huckabee’s belief in Creationism be weighed when assessing his candidacy. If you believe religious faith is a necessary condition for the Presidency – and clearly many people, including K-Lo

Because the current war just isn’t big enough…

National Review Online’s Andy McCarthy believes that the premise that: “we are all quite aware that the Muslims we take seriously are the formers and reformers'” — is mistaken.  We, as in you and I and many of us Corner types, may be aware of that.  But the American people generally are not.  They have been told, repeatedly, by high public officials (and those who would be high public officials) that there is one Islam, that it is a religion of peace (the religion of love and peace, sayeth our Secretary of State), and that the people we need to be concerned about constitute a tiny fringe who have distorted

Alex Massie

How the Elector of Saxony Created Osama bin Laden. Or Something.

So it’s all-Corner all the time here today. Next up is the never-knowingly-undersold Mark Steyn: The Islamic “reformation” is, in a sense, the opposite of Christianity’s. The Saudis have used their vast oil enrichment to promote themselves as a kind of Holy See for Muslims, and the Wahhabization of previously low-key syncretic localized Islams in almost every corner of the planet is testament to their success. I look at the gazillions of dollars tossed into the great sucking maw of US “intelligence” agencies and I wonder why somewhere in the budget we couldn’t put something aside to promote a bit of covert ideological rollback in Chechnya or Bosnia or Pakistan.

Derbyshire voted off the island…

John Derbyshire on fetishisation and Islamophobia (which does, of course exist, even if it is much less widespread than muslim “community leaders” would have you believe): Speaking of which, I have been voted off the New English Review site for being insufficiently Islamophobic. Fair enough. NER has now settled down as a definitely and strongly Islamophobic vehicle, and I’m a poor fit for it, being Islamophobophobic. In matters editorial I am anyway a believer in totalitarian despotism. I’ve seen enough of magazine and newspaper editors tearing their hair to know that it’s a wellnigh impossible job—”herding cats” is the merest approximation—and am content to leave them to it, so long

How do you solve a problem like… Liliana?

Intro of the Day: A convent in Italy is being shut down after a fight between its last three remaining nuns. So badly did relations deteriorate between the sisters of Santa Clara in Bari that the Mother Superior ended up in hospital with scratches to her face. Read the rest here.