Noah Charney

Wednesday

13 Jun 2018
The portrait that Churchill couldn’t face
The portrait that Churchill couldn’t face
The portrait that Churchill couldn’t face

Winston Churchill was no Adonis but most of his portraitists did what they could to flatter him. However, when the British artist Graham Sutherland (1903–80) was commissioned to paint a full-length portrait of Churchill in 1954 for 1,000 guineas (about £27,000 today), paid by the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and to be presented in a lavish public ceremony, things did not go well. Sutherland was chosen not by Churchill but by members of the Houses of Parliament in honour of his 80th birthday. Churchill asked to be portrayed in his Knight of the Garter robes but the commissioners specified he be portrayed as he most commonly dressed when visiting Parliament. Sutherland prepared for the portrait by making charcoal sketches of his subject’s face and hands on several occasions at the Churchill home at Chartwell, in August 1954.

The portrait that Churchill couldn’t face
Useful links
  • Advertise with us
  • Sponsor an event
  • Submit a story
More from The Spectator
  • Spectator Australia
  • Apollo Magazine
  • The Spectator Shop
About us
  • About The Spectator
  • Contact & FAQs
  • Privacy & cookies
  • Terms and conditions
  • Jobs and vacancies
  • Site map
Subscribe
  • Subscribe today
  • Sign up to our emails
  • The Spectator Club