Welfare is fast becoming this parliament’s Ypres Salient – strategically critical,
it is constantly contested. £20bn on social housing, £100bn on out of work benefits and £billions on universal benefits: welfare reform is where spending cuts are most
conspicuous. A rhetorical confrontation is building and various tactical dispositions are being made.
The Staggers’ George Eaton has an analysis that assumes that Labour’s current wedge-strategy (which I critiqued here) is not working because it is avowedly sectional, privileging those who might be caricatured as ‘undeserving’. Eaton argues that Labour must ‘launch a defence of the hard pressed majority’; those who work but still stand to lose, particularly families. Indeed, Westminster’s number-crunchers are briefing that the housing benefit reforms will adversely hit low income earners and force them from their communities, which totally defeats the coalition’s object.
On the right, Peter Oborne revisits his disapproval of George Osborne, who he claims has been fiddling benefit fraud figures to intimate that welfare dependency is cheating.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in