The indictment and trial on a thin charge, the gagging of a presidential candidate in the middle of a campaign, and the judge’s consistently biased rulings amount to deliberate judicial interference in the 2024 election. The process was led by a Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg, who ran on the campaign platform of going after
Comments
Want to join the debate?
Only subscribers can comment. Sign up and – in the run-up to the election – you’ll get the next 12 weeks for just £12.
CLAIM OFFER 12 weeks for £12Already a subscriber? Log in