No modern country wishes to understand itself through its remote past more ardently than does Korea. Nineteenth- century Korean nationalists were anxious to trace their state back to a mythical semi-divine hero, Tan’gun, who founded Korea in the third millennium BC. (Koreans will probably be irritated if it is suggested that this resembles Japanese eagerness to trace their imperial family back to an Emperor Jimmu, about 2,500 years ago.)
The communists enthusiastically join this hunt for origins. When the ‘Great Leader’, the late Kim Il Sung, dictator of North Korea, wanted to propose a federation of the North with the South, he suggested that the name for the united country should be Koryo, after a state that had existed from the 10th to the 12th centuries. The present ‘Dear Leader’, Kim Jong Il, claims to have been born on the sacred mountain, Paektu-su, which gives him divine status. About ten years ago archaeologists in the Stalinist state announced triumphantly that they had unearthed the bones of Tan’gun and his queen. Kim Il Sung did even better when he dug up the bones of another great hero who had been born from an egg on the banks of the Yalu river.
All this reflects anxieties about identity and legitimacy. Japanese nationalists used to claim that Koreans are anciently of Japanese stock, and that along with the Manchurians they should all live under One Roof, i.e. the Japanese Emperor. Some Koreans hoped that a tomb of a princess opened some years ago in Korea might prove, on the contrary, that the Japanese imperial family had Korean ancestry.
By contrast, most of the world is aware of Korea only through its recent history, the immensely destructive war of 1950–53, the Tiger economy of the South from the 1970s, the current nuclear weapons programme of Kim Jong Il.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in