Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

Any other business: Capping Hester’s bonus is far more important than stripping Goodwin’s knighthood

issue 28 January 2012

‘Always frightfully keen on the money,’ mutters a City grandee who watched Stephen Hester build his career at Credit Suisse, Abbey and British Land before taking over the helm of the sinking Royal Bank of Scotland from Sir Fred Goodwin. There’s nothing intrinsically wrong (let’s remember) in wanting to prosper alongside your shareholders. But as I wrote in July 2009, hiring a troubleshooter for RBS whose first instinct was to negotiate his own £1.2 million salary and £6 ­million share package was a missed opportunity ‘to set a public benchmark for more moderate City pay scales, which most of us believe are essential to long-term stability in the financial sector’. Now he’s said to be resisting pressure to waive a £1 million share bonus, and it’s clearly far too late to revert to my proposal that he should be paid a public servant’s salary of £212,500 a year — the sum Goodwin reluctantly surrendered from his giant pension — plus a gong at the end if he’s done a good job.

I have always argued that provocatively high boardroom pay will notch downwards only through a combination of market forces and enlightened, self-denying examples, rather than grandstanding by Vince Cable. It’s far more important that Hester should accept less now than he might once have thought was his due — given that economic conditions are so much worse, and RBS so far from recovery — than that Sir Fred should be humiliated by the confiscation of his gong. The Prime Minister’s referral of the Goodwin knighthood to a ‘forfeiture committee’ is a cheap ploy to wrong-foot Ed Miliband, and he ought to be ashamed of it. But he also ought to have Stephen Hester locked in a windowless room until he agrees to take one for the team.

Bounder on trial

If there’s a banker’s knighthood that really does deserve to be withdrawn, it’s the one awarded in 2006 to Texan-born Allen Stanford, whose trial on charges of running a $7 billion ‘Ponzi scheme’ has opened in Houston.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view
Martin Vander Weyer
Written by
Martin Vander Weyer
Martin Vander Weyer is business editor of The Spectator. He writes the weekly Any Other Business column.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in