If there’s one observation to make about Ed Balls’s speech this morning it’s that it’s punchy stuff. His main point is that the
coalition are “growth deniers” – not only do their “austerity and cuts” risk a slide back into recession, but they’re also unnecessary. He explains: Attlee didn’t make his
“first priority … to reduce the debts built up during second world war,” and he left us with the welfare state – so why should we cut spending now? Et cetera, et cetera. These
are, more or less, all arguments that we’ve heard from Balls before. But this is definitely the most concentrated form they have ever taken. It’s an unrelenting barrage of Brownite economics.
As always with Balls, there are exaggerations, inconsistencies and half-truths aplenty. Part of the problem is just that his reputation precedes him: so it’s funny to hear this disciple of “no more boom and bust” say that, “the first lesson I draw from history is to be wary of any British economic policymaker … who tells you that there is no alternative.”

Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in