“You’re the Conservative and Unionist party”, Miliband said. “This is neither for Conservatism nor Unionism.” There are grounds for disagreement on the latter point but, surely, none on the former. EVEL – even of the modest, watered-down beer type proposed by the government – is entirely for Conservatism. Not just for this parliament but for all parliaments to come. That’s the bloody point of it.
Which, of course, is also why the Labour party hates it. Because it would require a future Labour government to command a majority of English seats in order to legislate for English-only matters. (However – and this is a ticklish point – they are defined.)
Well, so be it. Perception matters in politics and many English people think they’re the subject of some (small, in my view) injustice. The days when the best answer to the West Lothian Question was to stop asking it have, for better – or more, likely, worse – gone. Something has to be done about it. Not because the English are scurrying off to Torches & Pitchforks R Us but because their low-level grumblings are based on a perfectly reasonable argument: if Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland may, to their varying degrees, legislate on matters pertaining solely to their domestic arrangements it is not so very appalling that the English have the same right to do so.
The SNP, always impressively flexible, now condemn a policy they once supported more keenly than any other party in the country.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in