Lloyd Evans Lloyd Evans

Complacent Cameron slips on Miliband’s bananas

Easy triumphs soften victors. Cameron demonstrated this truism today as he took two unexpected blows from Ed Miliband at PMQs. The Labour leader led on his new policy of rent controls. Cameron, rather weakly, seemed amenable to the reform but offered no concrete proposals of his own. Miliband struck.

‘That was a pretty quick U-turn, even for him.’

Miliband then asked about the preparations to surrender AstraZeneca, trussed and bound, to Pfizer – with all the attendant risks to jobs and investment.

Cameron flushed as red as a rhubarb crumble and accused Miliband of ‘playing politics’ while the government was ‘getting stuck in’ and defending the national interest.

What irked him was that the Pfizerisation of AstraZeneca has become yet another area where Miliband poses as a popular champion. Labour presents itself as the plucky foe of Big Pharma, while the government fiddles at the margins or connives with the fatcats.

Same with rent controls.

Miliband’s reforms sound reasonable and modest: extend tenancies from one year to three. Make rent rises predictable not arbitrary. Result: nine million home-renters benefit.

Cameron gave the impression that he endorsed this reform by claiming that the proposal had been aired at last year’s Tory conference. (So why keep it quiet till now?). But he couldn’t pledge his definitive support. Instead he spoon-fed candy floss to his backbenchers by joking that Labour policies were ‘for rent’ by Unite. And he quoted some contradictory noises-off by ill-briefed Labour MPs. But that didn’t alter the fact that Cameron seemed too ready to underestimate his opponent today. And his performance was misfiring badly. Slapdash on rent controls. Furious on Pfizer.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.


Unlock more articles



Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in