Counting the cost | 17 November 2007

The to-and-fro of the 2012 Olympic Games’s accounting transparency (or otherwise) continues to be what old sportswriters used to call ‘a ding-dong contest’.

The to-and-fro of the 2012 Olympic Games’s accounting transparency (or otherwise) continues to be what old sportswriters used to call ‘a ding-dong contest’. The shrill voice of the government’s Olympic minister Tessa Jowell insists on allegiance to the ancient competitive adage that attack is the best means of defence, while the opposition retaliates with the charge that the Olympic Delivery Authority has lost control of the £9.3 billion budget — £9.3 billion! — and, as well, has no clue how much of the additional £2.7 billion contingency fund will be gobbled up over the next few years.

Last week the glitzy architects’ plans for the new stadium were unveiled (it looks drearily samey to me) and as the hard-hats begin to dig and scrape (and more developer fat-cats begin to lick their lips), I wonder if anyone has asked what elementary maths lessons can be learnt from the last time London staged the games. Next summer, we celebrate the 60th anniversary of London’s 1948 Olympics, centred on the then 25-year-old Wembley stadium. Different times, sure; and different relations between sport, government and commerce.

VJ-day was 14 August 1945. Bombed-out, defiant London entered its Olympic bid in October 1945. The IOC ‘granted London the privilege’ in March 1946. The Games were opened by the King on 29 July 1948. Fifty-nine countries sent 4,071 athletes. In spite of rationing and, naturally, rain, a sublime time was had by all and such immortals as Zátopek, Blankers-Koen, Dillard, Wint and Mathias gloriously strutted their stuff. First 2008 birthday book out of the blocks is the unputdownable How London Rescued the Games (SportsBooks, £16.99)