This is the best Labour Party political broadcast I’ve seen in a while.
And:Working class history, multi-cultural, nhs, cnd, gay kissing. Well done comrade Boyle! Bet Dave is wriggling!
The Labour MP Paul Flynn blogged his agreement with Sargent:Mayor Boris could not take it. He wept. What else was left to do? Boris is strangled by his pre-event hyperbole. He was at it again today spewing wild meaningless superlatives hoping to obliterate the eloquent messages of Danny Boyle on NHS, CND, war futility.
Flynn went on to describe how:Wonderfully progressive socialist sentiments and ideas were smuggled into the opening romp. The Tory Olympic twosome were tricked into praising the Trojan Horse. Cameron and Boris could not condemn the wonders that they had praised to the skies 12 hours earlier.
This was not British history as Michael Gove sees it. There was an acknowledgement of the suffering of war, respect for fallen warriors without triumphalism. The centrepiece NHS sign was a worthy celebration of the greatest single political reform of the last century. The CND symbol was formed by the dancers. This is history from the perspective of Classic Labour.
Indeed. Yet what are those British conservatives who have been furiously dismissing exactly this claim for the last two days going to say about it now? To be clear: there were wonderful parts of the ceremony. There cannot have been anybody who did not thrill to the Queen’s scene with James Bond. But the claim that the ceremony did not become highly political is nonsense. If in doubt, consider the following thought-experiment. Among the people honoured with the task of carrying the Olympic flag was the left-wing campaigner Shami Chakrabarti. The stadium voiceover announced that this was because of her ‘integrity.’ The conservative philosopher Roger Scruton is some years Chakrabarti’s senior and I would say rather demonstrably her superior in achievement and ‘integrity’. Yet I do not believe Professor Scruton was asked to be one of the Olympic flag-bearers. Nor was Ayaan Hirsi Ali invited to be honoured for her integrity. Or Margaret Thatcher. Why not? To ask the question is to answer it: all are recognised, like Chakrabarti, to be highly political figures. As it happens I do not think any political figure – from any political direction – should have been involved in the ceremony. But the inclusion of Chakrabarti shows, as surely as the inclusion of Scruton, Hirsi Ali or Thatcher alone would have done, that the organisers were celebrating a particular political direction. This would have been obvious even without the CND logo and so on. As it is, though most people will remember the evening for some good jokes and a couple of stand-out performances, many people like Messrs Sargent and Flynn will continue to see it as a demonstration of the wholesale triumph of their particular political world-view. How sad that many British conservatives are now helping to prove them right.
Comments