Daniel Korski

Euro-bondage

At a time when the Euro is looking so weak, it is a wonder that so many countries are still queuing up to join. Estonia has recently joined, while Hungary and Bulgaria are keen as mustard to join as well. Make no mistake, these countries want to join. They go to lengths to stay for two years in the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, while keeping inflation inline with the EU average. At a meeting this morning, the Hungarian foreign minister capped off his country¹s EU Presidency by declaring that Hungary is still focused on joining.

But, even if these countries did not want to join the Euro, or felt perhaps that the Greek crisis was a reason to postpone membership, they would have no choice. For despite a widespread belief to the contrary among their citizens, all EU member-states, except for Denmark, Britain and Sweden, are obliged to adopt the euro as their sole currency when they meet the criteria. Agreeing to join the Euro was an integral part of European Union membership. They could not have one without the other.

From the point of view of the economic fundamentals emphasised by optimal currency area theory, which has formed the basis for the Euro, it is in the interest of Central European member-states to join the Eurozone as soon as possible. They are all too small, too open and too vulnerable to speculative attacks against their national currencies to be optimal currency areas. For the smallest ones among them, it is indeed doubtful whether a national currency is a viable option in the medium to long run.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in