Heads of the civil service rarely give interviews – especially not to voice their opinions on live political issues – so you know Gus O’Donnell must be worried about the public finances when he brings up the prospect of cuts in conversation with the Times today. Here’s the
key passage:
“Asked whether he agreed with a policy adopted in Canada, where spending was cut by 20 per cent and some departments had much deeper cuts than others, [O’Donnell] said: ‘You could envisage a situation where you go for deeper dives on this, most certainly.'”
O’Donnell’s comments – which go further than pretty much any poltician has managed so far – show how foolish it is to deny the necessity of spending cuts. It’s unsurprising, then, that Labour are now spinning about their “nice cuts” against “nasty Tory cuts”. But I suspect that particular approach has been fatally undermined by Brown’s crude “investment vs cuts” bravado of a few weeks ago.

Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in