
On the morning of Saturday 30 June 1860, the mutilated body of three-year Savill Kent was discovered in an outside privy at Road House, Wiltshire. The circumstances suggested that the murderer was almost certainly a member of the boy’s family or one of their servants. The case became something of a national obsession because of the age of the victim, the violence with which he had been attacked and the apparently secure and comfortable setting of the crime.
The master of the house was Samuel Kent, a government sub-inspector of factories. Also present on the night of the murder were his second wife (formerly the governess), four children by his first marriage and three by his second, as well as the three live-in servants. The local police were baffled, and the authorities bowed to the pressure of public opinion and summoned an investigator from Scotland Yard’s newly created detective department (the first to exist in an English-speaking country). This was Inspector Jonathan Whicher, one of the handful of men who were essentially inventing — even justifying — their job as they went along. Like most of his colleagues, he was of working-class origin, which added yet another frisson to the case: a member of the lower orders had been licensed to pry into the secrets of a middle-class family. Nothing was sacred; nothing was private. Whicher’s investigation was almost as shocking as the murder itself.
Whicher — even the name has a supercharged Dickensian quality that hints with memorable ambiguity at its owner’s attributes — was convinced he could identify the murderer, but proof eluded him and he faced much damaging criticism. Five years later, however, he was vindicated when his suspect confessed to the crime.

Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in