Mind your language | 5 April 2008

‘I wonder,’ writes Kim Parsons from Helston, or nearby, ‘if you have seen the new government-generated No Smoking signs which declare: “It is against the law to smoke in these premises.” Since when has on in this context become in?’’

I have seen the signs, because there is one at the church door in my parish, even though the incense continues to rise within. I suppose a church is ‘premises’, but the classic context of premises comes in the quotation from a licensing Act written above many an inn door, permitting the named proprietor ‘to retail beer, wine, spirits, and tobacco to be consumed on the premises’. What happens to the tobacco now that it can neither be legally sold for consumption off the premises nor legally be consumed on them, I do not know, unless it is chewed.

I think the horrible usage in the premises must come from some literal imagination of an enclosed space. If the church has a graveyard, smoking is legal there, and the graveyard is included in the legal concept of premises. The persecutors of smokers would probably say ‘on the graveyard’ instead of ‘in the graveyard’.

I have found, from 1610, a solitary counter-example, referring to the arrest in taverns of ‘all such as shall bee found to offend in the premisses’. That comes in a book by Barnaby Rich, an author of whose life we know little, though he left half a million words of treatises, romances and social commentary, mainly about Ireland.

As it happens he was an enemy of tobacco-smoking, which he saw as a peculiarly papist pastime which, in his eyes, made it no better. ‘Tobacco,’ he wrote in The Irish Hubbub (1617), ‘is like a Popes Bull, that Papists doe thinke to be a good discharge of all the sinnes they can commit, from the meanest to the maynest, from the eating of an egge, to the murthering of a King.’