Dot Wordsworth

Mind your language | 7 February 2004

A Lexicographer writes

issue 07 February 2004

I asked Veronica what the difference was between a pikey and a chav. ‘A pikey is like a pram-face, really rubbish, eats economy burgers and oven chips and watches telly all day. A chav dresses in sportswear, with white trainers and wears a fake Burberry baseball hat and hangs around the bus station starting fights.’

I began to feel out of my depth. There seems to be warfare going on among the late teens, between college kids and aggressive youths variously designated as townies, estate-dwellers, neds, pikeys and chavs. It sounds unpleasant. The popularity of the term chav has increased no end since the establishment of a website called ‘chavscum’ on the Internet. This takes a lofty attitude to chavs, regarding them as almost subhuman. They drive beaten-up cars fitted with alloy wheels, keep bull terriers and are aggressive. The boys have gelled fringes, the girls wear their hair tightly pulled back; both sexes are attracted by fake gold chains and such cheap jewellery as clown pendants.

The word pikey is often used to designate a traveller or true gypsy (someone with a gypsy tradition, not a command of the Romany language). But it has been broadened to include rough and disliked types, coming to mean the same as yob. Though these words catch on rapidly there seems to be little awareness of their origins. The Oxford English Dictionary does list pikey and derives it from pike, as in turnpike. That would not make it a Romany word. The earliest recorded citation is from John Orchard Halliwell’s Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial Words (1847), where it is defined simply as ‘a tramp or gypsey’.

The OED does not list chav. Youngsters who use it sometimes think it comes from Chatham or from Cheltenham Average.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in