James Delingpole James Delingpole

Past perfect | 8 March 2008

Mad Men (BBC4)

issue 08 March 2008

You have neat, slicked-back hair which never gets dandruff. You keep a pile of beautifully laundered white shirts stacked in your office drawer. You look great in your sharp suit and so does everyone else in theirs. The girls in the office are there to service your every need, and actually discuss with one another tactics for making themselves look sexier and how to please you more.

You smoke ALL THE TIME — so incredibly often that people in the future are going to look at you and wonder how it can possibly be that you and your friends smoked so much — and you do it suavely, without guilt or fear, for cancer has barely been invented.

You can give girls’ buttocks an affectionate pat in the office and that’s OK because sexual harassment hasn’t been invented either. Girls dress in a pretty, feminine way and seem quite prim and demure, but underneath they’re really gagging for it. You’re so well paid you can live in a spacious, antiquey white house in a smart district, and you certainly don’t need a second income from your wife.

Your kids do what they’re told. Your wife is pretty, doesn’t at all mind if you work late (because that’s what men do) but is definitely up for a bit of how’s your father when you get home. Your mistress is bohemian, sassy, understanding, great in the sack but unlikely to rock the boat.

As you see, I’ve been trying hard to find a reason not to wish myself back in time as a senior creative at a top Madison Avenue advertising agency in 1960 and I can’t think of one. I don’t think Mad Men (BBC4, Sunday), the utterly brilliant new series by Matthew Weiner (writer and producer on the last three series of The Sopranos), can either — though it pretends to do so, a teeny bit, so as not to frighten the liberals.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in