Robert Gates, the US Secretary of Defense, is stepping down and will be replaced, it is reported today, by Leon Panetta. Panetta, currently head of the CIA will in turn be succeeded by General David Petraeus. Gates of course is an ex-CIA guy himself but these latest appointments make it clearer than ever that CIA is all but an adjunct to DoD. That may not be a bad thing (and most of the intelligence budget is already spent by DoD anyway) but it does make one wonder about CIA’s future.
Politically speaking, both men will be easily confirmed and that’s no small consideration for the administration but it also suggests, I suspect, that the forthcoming National Security Council review of Afghan and Pakistan-related policy won’t recommend much more than “More of the Same.”
UPDATE: David Rothkopf has a much fuller take. His conclusion?
It is to Obama’s credit that he picks generally strong advisors. It is however, inevitable…and indeed, it is desirable…that they have a range of views. He must be the conductor, the leader, the one who brings coherence to the team. That can’t be done in a lawyerly, split the difference kind of way. And yet from his speech ramping up in Afghanistan to that announcing action in Libya, the message was, as I have written before, “hello, I must be going”…escalation and withdrawal, toughness and hesitation blended together. But adopting countervailing views is hardly the same as having a balanced approach. It produces confusion among allies and creates opportunities for enemies.
I think I agree with most of that.
Comments