Lloyd Evans Lloyd Evans

PMQs: Boris’s nadir

(Jessica Taylor/UK Parliament)

The bombshell at bay. That’s how Boris looked at today’s PMQs. Deflated, cornered, winded and lifeless. Gone were the chuckles and the mischievous jests, the punning quips and the poetic asides. He kicked off with a scripted apology that had two objectives: to neutralise public fury and to wrong-foot Sir Keir Starmer.

It did neither. Last night, footage emerged of Downing Street staff at a mock Q&A session making jokes about parties at No. 10 during lockdown. ‘I was also furious to see that clip,’ said Boris, as if suggesting that he was angrier than the angriest person in the country. He expressed his sorrow but couched it with lawyerly care. ‘I apologise for the impression that it gives,’ he said, dodging any admission of wrong-doing. Not exactly helpful to his cause.

The cabinet secretary has been asked to investigate the allegations. ‘If rules were broken,’ he said morosely, ‘there will be disciplinary action for all those involved.’ Even this probe is a lose-lose situation, as he knows. The best outcome — ‘not guilty’ — will be dismissed as a cover-up. He boasted, rather pathetically, that a copy of the report will be placed in the Commons library. As if letting MPs read the verdict was proof of his good character.

It’s hard to see how a politician can survive a scandal of this type

The SNP’s Ian Blackford cranked his amps up to the max and ordered Boris to ‘resign’ on the spot. That will make a few headlines but it leaves Blackford with no opportunity to increase the volume.

Sir Keir played it just right, with a blend of indignation and disbelief. The scandal has turned one of his great failings — his excessive pride in his legal career — into a strength.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in