Queen’s Gambit rejected

One of the most reliable methods of frustrating chess computers is to play 1 d4 but then avoid the well-trodden paths of the Queen’s Gambit, in favour of delaying central occupation with c4. Instead white aims for an early e3, possibly supported by the queenside bishop fianchetto, or Bf4. The former is known as the Colle Attack, while the latter is called The London System.

Such great masters as Zukertort, Capablanca, Alekhine and even our reigning world champion Magnus Carlsen, have used these less explored ways of entering the middlegame. Now the ever-industrious Cyrus Lakdawala has attempted to impose order and structure on the various transpositional possibilities and multifarious strategic motifs in his instructional new book First Steps: Colle and London Systems
 
Yusupov-Luch: Warsaw Rapid 2005; Colle System
 
1 d4 Nf6 2 Nf3 e6 3 e3 d5 4 Bd3 Be7 5 Nbd2 0-0 6 0-0 b6 This is the Colle versus the Queen’s Indian, but with Black’s d-pawn committed to d5. This is a factor which favours White, since it becomes a lot easier to launch an attack on Black’s king with a quick Ne5. 7 Ne5 Nfd7 This move may be unnatural, but it serves an important purpose: if Black plays … f5, as a counter to White’s coming f4, his king will be a lot safer. The obvious issue is that it isn’t a developing move. 8 f4 f5 9 Qe2 Nxe5 10 fxe5 c5 11 c3 Bb7 (see diagram 1) 12 g4 It’s time to shift into wrecking ball mode. When Black plays … f5 against the reversed Stonewall structure, then g4 becomes the natural break. 12 … g6 12 … fxg4?! 13 Qxg4 allows White’s queen into the attack for free. 13 gxf5 gxf5 14 Kh1 Kh8 15 Nf3 Qc8 This idea to swap off Black’s bad bishop via a6 looks awfully slow, since it distracts Black’s queen from the defence of her king.