Isaac Chotiner links to Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch’s splendid piece on libertarianism and calls it pretty absurd:
I have no idea what most citizens think about smoking bans and online gambling restrictions. But I do believe they are smart enough to know that these issues neither matter much, nor are worth voting on.
Well, I don’t think Ron Paul is going to win the Republican party’s presidential nomination either. But I’m willing to bet that for every person who votes for Ron Paul – knowing full well that he’s not likely to win – there’s at least one other person who would vote – or seriously consider voting for him or any other libertarian-minded candidate – if they thought that candidate had a realistic chance of winning.
And while Isaac may scoff at voters who consider matters such as smoking bans and online gambling important (the former hardly being a federal issue after all), I’d suggest that these are in fact pretty useful indicators of would-be Presidential temperament and philosophy.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in