I am always thrilled by a good performance of Giselle, especially when it is informed by choreographic consistency, dramatic fluidity and historical accuracy. That is why, last Friday, I left Sadler’s Wells in a jolly good mood. Indeed, Ballet Nacional de Cuba’s Giselle benefits greatly from the insight of its artistic director Alicia Alonso, a living legend and one of the 20th century’s greatest interpreters of the title role. Alonso’s acute sensitivity to the subtle nuances that underpin the classic does not stem solely from her dancing experience, but also draws clearly on historical research into the choreographic and performing formulae of the Romantic era. Attention to historical detail was clearly evident in many of the distinctive features of the performance I saw: the carriage of the arms, the placement of the corps de ballet on stage in the second act, the restoration of long-deleted scenes and, most of all, the flawless interaction between the choreographic text and the musical one.
In other words, this is a Giselle in which each character moves and ‘acts’ to the correct instrumental ‘voices’, much in line with what Adolphe Adam, one of the first ballet composers to use ‘speaking music’, wanted. This is also a Giselle in which Act II’s dramatic build-up is aptly introduced, as it was in the original 1841 production, by a group of merry hunters who decide to stop in the enchanted wood on their way home at night. The dice-game episode creates a strong link between the subsequent supernatural events and Act I’s ‘earthly’ drama. Finally, this is a Giselle in which the Wilis form artistic and romantic-looking groups all over the stage, instead of moving in the usual regimented way — a feature that belongs more to the Imperial Russian ballet era than to the earlier French Romantic one.
The production is anything but an experiment in choreographic archaeology, though. Historically accurate ideas are interspersed with more contemporary ones, which have clearly been derived from Alonso’s own mid 20th-century interpretative experience. As such, they might look slightly incongruous or dated to some 21st-century ballet-goers. Still, they blend well with the rest of the production, adding somehow to that intriguing patina of a bygone era for which this staging stands out. Unlike other contemporary versions, in which the discrepancies between the standard choreography and the more modern interpolation are often painfully evident, this Giselle flows seamlessly in both choreographic and dramatic terms.
The company’s excellent dancing, moreover, made one overlook other minor weaknesses of the production, such as the cartoonish sets and the far-too-garish, typically 1950s costumes of Act I. Without ever slipping out of a carefully evoked Romantic atmosphere, each member of the corps de ballet gave a terrific, enthralling and exhilarating performance, combining modern-day panache with sensible interpretation and acting. The night I went, Anette Delgado was the eponymous heroine. Petite, young-looking and endowed with a winning mixture of strong technique and aerial lightness, she is a fully credible Giselle. Next to her, dashing R
Comments