Andrew Roberts

Short and sweet | 19 July 2008

Lloyd Evans on the great texting debate

issue 19 July 2008

What do you make of this texting business? It took me on a surprisingly complex journey. First I felt revulsion, then doubt set in, then I sensed a developing acceptance and finally I embraced it with utilitarian enthusiasm. At one point I was even touched by a Shavian zeal that texting might usher in a new universal shorthand which would simplify and accelerate communication. Not that I wanted conventional spellings eradicated. A word’s spelling is an encryption of its history. But I was tempted by the prospect of an alternative orthography so we cd typ thgs lke ths 2 ch othr. It’s doubtful this will ever happen as David Crystal’s entertaining book argues. The emergence of texting was greeted by hysteria in the press. ‘Bleak bald bad shorthand. Drab shrinktalk,’ huffed the Guardian in 2002. Others worried that texting would ‘rape’ the language. Certainly its popularity took everyone by surprise and the market is now worth over $700 bn dollars a year, three times the box office receipts for Hollywood movies.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in