I was struck recently as I perused the modest collection of bottles I pretentiously call my ‘home cellar’ (the really good stuff has to be kept out reach, I’m afraid) by the dreadful uniformity of its contents. There was certainly enough variety in terms of style, but everything was held within the globally invariant, ubiquitous, standard 75 cl bottle. Don’t get me wrong I think 75 cl is a wonderful – arguably ideal – size, but variety is the spice of life and I was lacking it!
Why? Was this because we now live in an increasingly choice-less society or a sad reflection of my ‘half a couple with kids’ status? There are lots of reasons for straying from the standard measure and plenty of variations. Firstly and most commonly there is the half bottle (37.5cl) the case for which is indisputable. A full bottle is a hefty dose for a lone imbiber, and they’re also good for drivers (sharing), restaurant-goers (more choice) and impromptu picnickers (less baggage). Another asset of the humble half is that they have a greater ratio of air to wine and are thus earlier maturing; conversely larger formats age more slowly, which can also have its advantages. Sadly, as worldwide demand for quality wine increases, the willingness of wine producers to bottle in ‘other formats’ diminishes.
The magnum or double bottle (1.5 litres) should never be overlooked. The name sounds great, especially when ordered with confidence in a restaurant. They look fantastic and add panache to any dinner table. Moreover they hold twice the volume, which should keep the party going while giving the host less work opening bottles. They’re also ideal for ‘laying down’ long term.
Two sizes that I tend to avoid are half litres (a largely failed European glass manufacturers marketing initiative), whose only possible justification is for sweet wines, and litres, which are just too studenty (and I have been there).