The age of two-party politics is over: we know that because everyone keeps saying so. We are entering an era of coalitions, apparently, where compromise is king and a wider variety of views will be represented in parliament. These barely comprehensible seven-way television debates are the future, we are assured, and decisive general election results a thing of the past.
Look deeper and this analysis falls apart. Even now, Labour and the Conservatives between them have about two thirds of the vote, just as they did at the last general election. What we are witnessing is the collapse of the Liberal Democrats, who have been reduced — on a bad day — to being the UK’s sixth most popular party. This is the paradox of the 2015 election: the country seems destined for messy, multi-party coalition negotiations, yet Labour and Conservatives stand to hold, between them, a higher proportion of English seats than at any time since the 1980s. If the election fails to produce a decisive result, it will be because of the revolution taking place in Scotland.
As things stand, the SNP looks set to sweep most Scottish seats and supplant the Liberal Democrats as the third-largest party in Westminster. Nicola Sturgeon’s aim is to put Ed Miliband in power, then torture him. The SNP has no interest in the smooth running of the United Kingdom. It is a party of saboteurs whose stated aim is the partition of Britain. Miliband’s refusal to rule out a deal with the SNP shows that he is willing to accept their meddling as the price for power.
So the outcome of this election may well be parliamentary bedlam. But only because the two-party system will have increased its share in England, while Scotland becomes a one-party country.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in