Rachel Sylvester is on top form in the Times today, and I’d urge CoffeeHousers to
delve behind the paywall (or borrow someone’s copy of the paper) to read her column. Its
central point? That ministers are discovering ingenious ways to exploit and undermine the ringfenced health and international development budgets. The Home Office is saying that drug
rehab programmes should fall under health spending. The Foreign Office is trying to pass off some of their spending as development, and so on. And, crucially, the Treasury seems to be
going along with it:
As Sylvester says, there’s something “absurd” about all this. After all, the government could have reached the same result by not ringfencing health and international development, and giving the other departments more money to spend on their current responsibilities. But it also opens questions about intra-coalition relations. The Lib Dems opposed ringfencing during the election – and with them now heading departments which have barely any crossover with the health and development budgets, they may feel they’re losing out on both counts.“The Treasury seems to be tacitly endorsing this approach, with officials emphasising that departmental boundaries are artificial.”
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in