Earlier this morning, Number 10 briefed that fiscal union in the eurozone would not trigger a referendum in this country
because sovereignty will not be transfered from London to Brussels — a pre-requisite for any vote.
The problem for Cameron is that some of his backbenchers say there should be a referendum. Bernard Jenkin was on the Daily Politics earlier, insisting that fiscal integration marks a new era in the history of the Eurozone, which he dubbed ‘Maastricht Plus’.
On the other hand, some eurosceptic backbenchers caution that now is not the time to hold a referendum — stability in the eurozone is the order of the day. As I wrote yesterday, this cautious backbench dynamic suits the prime minister, whose present aim, a spokesman said this morning, is to support the Eurozone rather than repatriate competences from the EU.
However, Conor Burns, PPS to Northern Ireland Secretary Owen Patterson, appeared to challenge the government’s position during an interview with the World at One, saying
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in