So it was all Jill Pay’s fault. That was Michael Martin’s verdict. He didn’t know. The Serjeant At Arms should have asked for a warrant and she didn’t. Nor did he shrink from dumping on her. He’ll grant a debate on Monday and set up a committee of grandees (just as he did with the expenses furore). Here are the key points from the Speaker’s statement.
–“Parliamentary privilege has never prevented the operation of criminal law” – except when they’re dodging expenses fraud, or voting to exempt themselves from their own FOI laws.
— “On Wednesday last, the Met informed the Serjeant at Arms that an arrest was contemplated. I was told in the strictest confidence by her that a member might be arrested and charged, but not further details were given to me.” So this would have been a good time to go on full alert? Dust down the Commons rule book? It seems not.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in