Charles Clover

Britain has wronged the Chagossians again

Members of the Chagossian community outside the High Court (Credit: Getty images)

I could not resist rushing to the High Court to witness the eleventh-hour challenge to the deal to give away the Chagos archipelago to Mauritius, brought by two valiant Chagossian women. Outside, their supporters chanted ‘Chagossians British’ and waved their passports. Inside, it was a legal massacre, with the government’s lawyers insisting that the Foreign Secretary’s power to make treaties is not reviewable by the courts, that David Lammy had ‘broad powers of discretion’ to make what deals he liked with Mauritius and that there had been no promise to consult with the Chagossians on its terms, which meant no promise had been broken.

If a succession of foreign secretaries had tried engaging with the Chagossians, the islands could have stayed British

As the judge reeled off the grounds for overturning the injunction that had paused the deal overnight, it became brutally obvious that by not consulting them on the deal in any meaningful way and saying it didn’t have to, Britain was doing a second great wrong to British Chagossians.

Britain’s best politics newsletters

You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in