What do Historic Royal Palaces think they are doing? They’re the people who look after the five royal palaces not occupied by the Queen, and their activities have been constrained by the fact that most of the contents are owned by her. But the recent reopening of Kensington Palace has gone to their heads. It’s as if, after decades of patiently interpreting the arcana of royal households, they’ve burst out of their corsets and gone wild.
Kensington Palace, remember, is an edifice of such established importance that it’s not even listed. The only thing that is listed there is the statue of Queen Victoria in Kensington Gardens. Kensington Palace was scheduled as an ancient monument long before listing came into existence.
Just the place, you might have thought, for Michael Day, the HRP’s chief executive, to fulfil the vision that he sets for his organisation. ‘In a world that is more uncertain than ever, people are searching for roots, foundations and anchors,’ announces Mr Day on the HRP website. ‘They want to understand how the past shaped the present, and they want to protect the things they value.’
But rather than taking the palace seriously as an historic place, the new display is the equivalent of a pantomime. The visitor is treated like a child who has been invited on stage. We have themes, moods and theatrical effects; but precious few facts. We have actors engaging us in conversation about court news. Where there are genuine exhibits — uniforms, Queen Victoria’s baby shoes — they don’t have labels.
I went to see the staircase by Sir Christopher Wren in the Queen’s Apartments. The space has been filled by a tree-like structure, which might also be a mast, from whose branches hang ships in bottles.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Don't miss out
Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.
UNLOCK ACCESSAlready a subscriber? Log in