George Orwell would have plenty to say about the language used in the assisted dying debate. As Orwell wrote in his essay ‘Politics and the English Language’: ‘When you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself’. He continued, ‘political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind’. Never has this been truer than in relation to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which is back for debate in parliament today.
Dignity in Dying, the organisation that campaigns in favour of assisted dying, would certainly trouble Orwell. In 2006, after just over 70 years, the Voluntary Euthanasia Society changed its name to Dignity in Dying. The name ‘Voluntary Euthanasia Society’ tells you what the society is about; ‘Dignity in Dying’ does not. This shows just how language can corrupt thought, something against which Orwell railed.
The debate on assisted dying is rife with troubling possibilities
‘Dignity in dying’ is the aim of any hospice worth its salt.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in