James Forsyth James Forsyth

Why history will struggle with Bush

The Bush presidency can hardly be termed a success. But I suspect, historians will soon be boosting Bush’s standing. Why? Because Bush’s answer to the terrorism question is, basically, right. In the short term, you have to disrupt their networks, deny them safe haven and—if all else fails—kill them. But in the long term, you have to fight the causes of terrorism by creating democratic, prosperous societies where people control their own destinies: in such places, terrorists and their causes do not find support. But, ironically considering that Bush was the first MBA president, the execution of these ideas was appalling.

There’s also a paradox when it comes to Bush and presidential decision making. I suspect that Bush’s decision to order the surge will soon be regarded as one of the great acts of presidential leadership. His own Secretary of State, huge chunks of his own party, the foreign policy establishment, the media and public opinion wanted the United States to cut its losses and start withdrawing from Iraq.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in