Fraser Nelson Fraser Nelson

Why it’s still worth asking questions on lockdown

Covid press conference, March 2020 (photo: Getty)

Rishi Sunak’s interview in last week’s magazine has inspired a lot of comment. Two this week: Lee Cain, ex-No. 10 spin chief, in The Spectator and Robert Shrimsley in the Financial Times, warns about the promotion of betrayal ‘lockdown fables’ promoted by ‘mythmakers’ and ‘lockdown sceptics trying to rewrite history’. He and I discussed this on Twitter yesterday. I’m a big admirer of Shrimsley and think he deserves a more considered response than whatever can be squeezed into 280 characters.


Cain:

‘Opponents still say lockdown was a mistake. What do these critics think would have happened to transmission rates – rising exponentially – if we had failed to lockdown? What would they have done instead? Mr Sunak says he’d have had ‘a grown up conversation with the public.’ But what does this mean in policy terms? Do lockdown sceptics believe people would have voluntarily stayed at home and avoided social contacts, as in Sweden, so restrictions were not needed?’




Shrimsley:

‘More dishonest is to discount the deaths that would have come both from failing to lock down and the consequent overwhelming of the NHS. How many deaths would have been acceptable and what level of chaos in hospitals tolerable? On this, funnily enough, there is no answer.’




To their points:


1. What would have happened to Covid transmission rates if we had failed to lock down?

One answer: they were probably falling by then (so the R-number would have been below one) as per Prof Simon Wood’s study here. Is Wood a minority voice? Well, what about Chris Whitty – who himself has said, in light of what we now know, that Covid transmission rates were falling by lockdown. ‘Quite a lot changed that led to the R going below one well before, or to some extent before, March 23’ he has said.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Keep reading with a free trial

Subscribe and get your first month of online and app access for free. After that it’s just £1 a week.

There’s no commitment, you can cancel any time.

Or

Unlock more articles

REGISTER

Comments

Don't miss out

Join the conversation with other Spectator readers. Subscribe to leave a comment.

Already a subscriber? Log in