Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Will civil partnerships kill the gay marriage bill?

There’s a conspiracy theory doing the rounds in Westminster that the ‘wrecking amendment’ for the gay marriage bill is a nifty way of the government dropping the legislation because it is unaffordable, and blaming Labour for backing a reckless proposal. At the morning lobby briefing, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman wouldn’t directly speculate on what might happen if the amendment does pass, simply saying ‘the government has a legislative programme’ and reiterating Maria Miller’s point that ‘there are a number of complexities’.

I’ve spoken to a government source, though, who insists that even if the suggested £4bn price tag for pension liabilities as a result of heterosexual civil partnerships is correct, the government would still want to see the bill pass into law. They said:

‘There’s no sense at all that we won’t progress the bill over this.’

The source also added that the conspiracy theory ‘doesn’t add up’ because this amendment is simply an inconvenience to the government.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in