James Forsyth

James Forsyth

James Forsyth is former political editor of The Spectator.

Going back to where we were will just lead to an even bigger crash

The Washington Post has an interesting interview with Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the author of the black swan thesis. In it, he’s very dismissive of economists and makes some sensible comments about bonuses. But what struck me as most interesting was his final answer: “My rosy scenario is that a better economic environment will develop, a

James Forsyth

Another G20 disappointment for Brown

Today’s Observer reports: “Gordon Brown’s hopes of uniting the world’s most powerful economies behind a massive new package of tax cuts and public spending increases suffered a serious blow yesterday when he failed to persuade France and Germany to back his plan to revive the world economy. After talks at Chequers to prepare the way

Petraeus planning 2010 visit to Iowa

Update: Michael Goldfarb now says he meant the Iowa item as a joke. So, this post is no longer operative. Apologies, I thought Goldfarb was being serious. “THE WEEKLY STANDARD has learned that General Petraeus is planning on delivering the commencement address at the University of Iowa in 2010.” So reports Michael Goldfarb, late of

James Forsyth

Utter Balls

Sometime a politician says something that is so at odds with reality that one almost hopes that it is spin rather than what they really think. Yesterday, Ed Balls said that it was “nonsense” to claim that IGCSEs are more demanding than GCSEs. This is patent rubbish. Pretty much any teacher, or pupil, will tell

James Forsyth

Failure in Afghanistan would have terrible consequences

Max Boot and Fred and Kimberly Kagan’s report on Afghanistan in The Weekly Standard is well worth reading in full. The three authors played key roles in making the case for the surge that has helped to transform Iraq and their comparisons of the two countries are instructive and suggest that the situation is less dire

Transparency in public spending

Steve Richards argues with his typical eloquence for higher public spending today. Unsurprisingly, I disagree with him. But, intriguingly, he endorses an idea that in the medium term would, I think, be incredibly effective in cutting down the size of the state. Steve writes: “The shadow Chancellor, George Osborne has proposed the equivalent of America’s

James Forsyth

The urgent need for school reform

Every day seems to bring forward new statistics which illustrate the urgent need for radical education reform. Take this from Camilla Cavendish’s column:  “150,000 pupils start secondary school innumerate every year” The state of state education in this country is a national scandal. Its failings are destroying both social mobility in Britain and this country’s

James Forsyth

Preventing further tragedy

Camilla Cavendish, who writes with such passion and authority on this issue, sets out why the Serious Case Review into Baby P’s death should be published in The Times today: “I had hoped that he might challenge the refusal of Ed Balls to publish serious case reviews (SCR) in instances where children have died. The

Harman’s biggest weakness

There’s a smart piece in this week’s Economist on what might be the biggest obstacle to Harriet Harman becoming Labour leader after the next election, the narrowness of her range:  “Ms Harman also personifies a rather narrow sect of Labour thought. Unkindly nicknamed “Hattie Harperson” for her political correctness, she has often championed a cultural

James Forsyth

Balls should publish the Baby P Serious Case Review

The Lord Laming review of the progress that has been made in child protection since his report following the death of Victoria Climbie is all well and good. But, surely publishing the Serious Case Review into Baby P—which Ed Balls refuses to do—would do more good? It shows precisely how the bureaucracy made such a

James Forsyth

The SEC was tipped off that Madoff was a fraud in 2000 but did nothing

An article in Mother Jones highlights out one of the most scandalous aspects of the Madoff case, the SEC’s refusal to act on information it was given about Madoff:  “Among those that did learn of Madoff’s money management business was Boston-based Rampart Investment Management Company, Inc. In late 1999, Frank Casey, then a senior vice president

James Forsyth

The cost of Brown’s meddling

Gordon Brown claims not to know what he should say sorry for. Well, he could start with apologising for his role in Lloyds’ takeover of HBOS. Iain Martin puts it perfectly in today’s Telegraph: “The catastrophe at Lloyds-HBOS is the ultimate New Labour scandal. It has the lot: cronyism, back-scratching, destructive micromanaging by Gordon Brown

James Forsyth

Going down the Tube again

From today’s Standard: “Transport chiefs shut Bank’s Central line platforms for 90 minutes last night after complaints that decibel levels from screeching rails were too high. The closure left thousands of commuters facing severe delays just after 5.30pm. They described the decision as “madness”. Transport for London admitted the problem, caused by a lack of

James Forsyth

The Luton protest

It is hard not to feel rage when one sees soldiers returning home from serving their country being abused by protestors as they were in Luton yesterday. There are those who are making a free speech argument in defence of the police allowing these Islamists to picket the homecoming parade. But the problem is that

James Forsyth

The odds are loaded in the terrorists’ favour

Media coverage of the dissident Republican groups has focused on the question of how much support they have. But, as Martyn Frampton pointed out on The Today Programme this morning, a terrorist organisation doesn’t actually need that many people to cause serious disruption because the odds are loaded in their favour. As the IRA, who

James Forsyth

Labour’s economically inactive support

I’m fairly sceptical of polls at the moment, politics has been so unusual these past few weeks I’m not sure how worthwhile a snapshot is right now. But the breakdown of today’s numbers in The Times —Labour 30, Tories 42, and Lib Dems 19—does strike me as fascinating. Peter Riddell points out the differences between public