Susanna Gross

Bridge | 27 February 2014

issue 01 March 2014

To any player with even the smallest sadistic streak, squeezing your opponents is hugely satisfying. But there’s something even more enjoyable: pseudo-squeezing them. With a genuine squeeze, you make them squirm, but they can console themselves afterwards that there was nothing they could have done. That’s no fun. With a pseudo-squeeze, you get to see them squirm and kick themselves when they realise they’ve been duped. On this recent deal, the UK star Gopal Venkatesh was hoodwinked by Bulgaria’s Valio Kovachev:

[*2♠ was a game try; 2NT a relay; 3♣ asked for help in clubs] Venkatesh (West) led the9.  Even with the K onside, Kovachev had only nine tricks: two spades, five hearts, a diamond and a club. He could lead a diamond, hoping to find East with Ax, but he had a hunch West held the K, based on his failure to lead the suit. Kovachev decided his best hope was to paint a false picture of his hand. He put up dummy’s Q, which held. Trying to create the impression he needed a club ruff, he played a club to the ten. West won and played a second heart, to declarer’s ten. The ♣9 went to dummy’s ♣J, and East won and returned the K to declarer’s A, West discarding a club.

On the next trump, West parted with the 5, declarer pitched the 2 from dummy, and East the ♣6. On the last trump, West, imagining declarer held ♠Ax, discarded the 10. Now declarer could knock out the A and score three diamonds tricks to bring home the contract.

Kovachev had stranded his winning ♣K in dummy, but gained two extra tricks in the process.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in