The mills of God
Sir: Theo Hobson’s concern at the emergence of Grindr (‘Gay sex by sat-nav’, 10 July) is understandable but he goes too far in describing the phenomenon as typical of male homosexual culture. Hedonism there certainly is, but that is not an exclusively gay characteristic, nor is it the case that male gay culture is the vector by which heterosexual culture becomes hedonistic. There are other trends within gay culture that emphasise the significance of constancy and commitment. The Revd Dr Jeffrey John’s Permanent, Faithful, Stable is a particularly significant example. It applies to gay relationships the wisdom of centuries of Christian experience. It applies such orthodoxy in its approach to this aspect of human sexuality that it might have been written by a bishop.
Revd Jeffrey James
Gloucestershire
Sir: I must congratulate Theo Hobson for raising blood pressures around the country. Of course, as Mr Hobson was limited to only one page, I understand why he was reduced to puerile generalisations, but I do hope that in future he won’t pad out his mutterings with other journalists’ work.
Ruari Craig-Wood
Surrey
Alternative thinking
Sir: James Forsyth claims that under AV, the process ‘keeps going until one candidate has more than half of votes cast’ (‘Coalition forever’, 10 July). This depends on the form of AV. If the electors are not compelled to put a number beside every candidate and thus express a remote preference for a party they abhor — say, the BNP or the SWP — then they may well still be allowed to vote for only one candidate, and can avoid some parties altogether.
Take the kind of constituency common in the south in which the Lib Dems have already squeezed the Labour vote. Of the 100,000 who have voted, 42,000 have voted Conservative, 38,000 Lib Dem and 18,000 Labour. Ten thousand of these Labour voters, the sturdy rump of the party, are appalled by the coalition and do not cast a second preference for anyone. Seven thousand Labour voters give their preferences to the Lib Dems and a quixotic 1,000 to the Tories. The last 2,000 votes are evenly distributed between Lib Dems and Tories. The final result is 44,000 votes to the Conservatives, 46,000 to the Lib Dems. Neither has a majority of over 50,000.
Sheridan Gilley
Durham
Absurd system
Sir: Charles Moore (The Spectator’s Notes, 10 July) complains that you can’t have first-past-the-post for the vote to get rid of first-past-the-post. You can — it is called reductio ad absurdum.
Dr Alexander Paseau
Wadham College, Oxford
Home truths
Sir: Lucas Klein (Letters, 10 July) is wrong to equate his experiences, while watching the England vs Germany World Cup match in an English pub, with a general prejudice against Germany. In any serious match the supporters of one team, on the territory of and surrounded by their rivals’ supporters, would expect worse than hostile glares if they visibly celebrated a goal against their opponents, however restrained. That is why rival supporters are segregated in nearly every stadium. No sensible Charlton supporter would go near a pub in Millwall or Crystal Palace territory to watch a ‘local derby’ on TV. If they happened to be in one without at first realising, they would be wise to celebrate their opponents’ goals and express dismay when their own team scores — painful but essential for self-preservation. I’m afraid Herr Klein’s experience shows England supporters at their most tolerant and civilised.
Keith Ferris
Coxheath
Frustrated liberals
Sir: James Delingpole (You Know It Makes Sense, 10 July) is right, the so-called ‘liberal elite’ are not carrying the liberal torch in our times: they constantly cheerlead for big, interfering governments. But neither is freedom the domain of ‘the right’.
Ask any person on the street what views they associate with the ‘right-wing’ and you will most likely hear: anti-immigration, nationalism, NIMBYism, social conservatism. All of these are strong forces working against the freedom of the individual.
The Liberal Democrats have a good record defending civil liberties (opposition to ID cards, detention without trial, et cetera) but Liberal Vision wants the party to go further — to support lower taxes, a smaller state and more personal freedoms.
To promote freedom we must encourage liberal thinking wherever it falls on the political spectrum, and this can be done without sullying it with the association of ‘the right’. James Delingpole may be glad to discover that many of us Liberals are just as frustrated by bureaucrats, politicians and rent-seekers as he is.
Julian Harris
Director, Liberal Vision, London NW6
Pound cake
Sir: While I enjoyed Rod Liddle’s recipe for ‘a nice right-wing cake for summer’ (‘We should all be free to call each other coconut’, 3 July), I believe I have spotted a mistake. Surely the ingredients for such a cake should be measured in imperial units, not metric?
Christopher Stephens
New York
Happy ending
Sir: Many thanks to Geoffrey Wheatcroft (Letters, 3 July) for his very gracious response to me. If my memory is good, the last time we met was at the Garrick over some champagne, with Max Hastings, I think, more than ten years ago. Let us take up exactly where we left off, as soon as my schedule opens up, but he should not think I am resigned to him being the host — perhaps we can compromise and lay it off on Max. I much look forward to it.
Conrad Black
Coleman, Florida, USA
Comments